Futterman, Sirotkin & Seinfeld, LLP
Free Consultations *
For Personal Injury and Medical Malpractice Matters Only
toll free: 866-679-2513
Kew Gardens: 718-577-2573
Woodbury: 516-681-0250
contact Menu
We continue to be here for you as we monitor the current COVID-19 health crisis. Futterman, Sirotkin & Seinfeld remains open. Our staff is working remotely and the firm will continue to be functional and operational.
You can reach all of us via email or leave a message on our phone extensions and we will return the calls as quickly as possible.
We are concerned about the health and safety of all of our clients and wish all of you the best during these difficult times.

Over 60 Years In Queens County

Thank you so much for all your help. You are a true God send and I feel blessed for having your assistance. Wishing you and your family well wishes and a Happy New Year too!

Thank you for “services rendered” to my complete satisfaction. On that note, a special thank you to Judy Ramirez and Veronica Fuentes for their many contributions. With your knowledge and experience...

Thank you for doing such a great job representing my son on the purchase of his condo. As I am sure you could tell, he was very nervous about the whole thing, been waiting for the other shoe to...

On behalf of the family of the Estate of Marlene U., I would like to express my sincere gratitude to the law firm of Futterman, Sirotkin & Seinfeld, LLP for its unwavering commitment...

I feel blessed that somehow your firm in and my life crossed because the result is the quality of my mother’s life in respect to current and future needs is secure …

Dear Martin and Ira, thank you so much for working so hard on my case for so many years. My life changed 10 years ago when this occurred. I'm glad this chapter of my life has closed.

Just wanted to express how happy I am with your firm. I have known you for over 15 years starting with the purchase of my first home and when I continued utilizing your services when...

Words can not fully express how grateful and impressed I am with your outstanding services. Working with you and your staff not only made me feel comfortable and reassured but ...

I wanted to express my sincere gratitude for your efforts over the last two years regarding my case. Your attention to the details surrounding-my case was second to none...

Me sentir bien comoda con mi dos abogados, el Sr. Martin y el Sr. Futterman, que me trataron mi caso con mucha delicadeza y puecieron mucho tiempo en mi case

Read More Testimonials
view our Practice areas

Medical Malpractice Archives

New York Hospitals Get Low Grades in Study of Patient Safety

Hospitals are supposed to help people get well, not get sicker. But avoidable medical mistakes and failure to follow, and enforce, simple common sense sanitary and safety precautions, on medical and other staff, continue to present a real threat to the health and safety of patients.


Governor Cuomo's 2011-12 budget contains a proposal to cap medical malpractice awards for non-economic losses at $250,000.  Hospitals and doctors claim that their medical malpractice premiums are excessive, and only by instituting a cap on damages can they lower their premiums.  This reasoning is flawed.  Damage caps enable negligent doctors to evade their responsibility to their patients, and protect insurance company profits, while depriving harmed patients of justice when they have been injured by the neglect and carelessness of others.  One way to lower medical malpractice premiums, without sacrificing patient rights, is to institute federal and state regulations that not only require continuing education, but hold those in the medical field accountable for their mistakes.  Recently, there have been numerous reports of patients who have suffered from overdoses of radiation.  As a result of mistaken radiation overdoses, patients have suffered from burns, soft tissue injury, bone death, organ failure, and death.  But these overdoses haven't all occurred recently.  Rather, the details were buried in hospital records and never reported to state health officials as required.  In an article from January 2010, Walt Bogdanich of the New York Times reported that there had been 621 radiotherapy mistakes from 2001 to 2008 (Walt Bogdanich, Radiation Offers New Cures, and Ways to Do Harm, N.Y. Times, January 23, 2010).  Yet, over the last 10 years, New York health officials have not disciplined any of the approximately 20,000 licensed technologists for work-related problems (Walt Bogdanich and Kristina Rebelo, X-Rays and Unshielded Infants, N.Y. Times, February 27, 2011).  Allowing these technologists to continue to administer treatment, while their mistakes remain hidden from the public, subjects more patients to the dangers of over radiation and contributes to increases in malpractice premiums.  For example, in 2008 a radiation therapist administered 10 times as much radiation as prescribed in one spot, and one-tenth the prescribed dose in another.  As a result, the patient was too sick to continue chemotherapy and died several months later.  The same therapist was later reprimanded in another case, and not only continues to work at the hospital, but has also trained other workers (Walt Bogdanich, Radiation Offers New Cures, and Ways to Do Harm, N.Y. Times, January 23, 2010).  A cap on medical malpractice awards will only provide another layer of protection, allowing negligence to continue with even less accountability. In a recent article, Thomas Kaplan examines the truth behind the claim that a cap on non-economic damages will reduce insurance premiums.  Citing research conducted in California, a state that implemented a $250,000 cap on non-economic damages in 1975, it is clear that the proposed cap will not bring the big savings its supporters are predicting.  In the ten years after California enacted the cap doctors did not see the cost of their insurance policies plummet.  In fact, the total paid in premiums increased 176 percent (Thomas Kaplan, Lessons for Albany on Malpractice Limits, N.Y. Times, March 24, 2011).  Ultimately, what researchers have found, is that limiting non-economic damages in malpractice cases has the effect of slowing the rate of growth in premiums (id.).  It hardly seems fair to implement such a harsh cap on the damages that a severely injured patient can recover, when doing so will do so little for the doctors Governor Cuomo urges it will help. Moreover, the repercussions to injured patients as a result of the cap are more extreme than they appear on the surface.  Once the caps are in place, liability carriers will know the limits of their liability.  Since New York is a state without effective and realistic bad faith actions, which would punish an insurance company for failing to negotiate in good faith, we can expect medical malpractice insurance companies to act as their counterparts in automobile liability insurance, where there is limited coverage.  They know the costs of trial, and will offer settlements deducting what they know the trial will cost a plaintiff (for experts, etc.).  In reality, the $250,000 cap will result in a cap on settlements between $200,000 and $225,000, from which attorneys' fees must then be paid.  As a result, victims with catastrophic injuries will receive only a pittance for compensation.  But, doctors' premiums will not significantly go down.  Instead, the profits of insurance companies and the fat cat corporations, that own and manage hospitals, will soar.  Profits that will be paid for by the uncompensated lives and pain of victims of malpractice. Governor Cuomo's proposed cap on medical malpractice damages is not the answer.  Improving the quality of medical service and removing incompetent or dangerous doctors will lower insurance premiums and ensure patient safety.  Continuing education requirements will make sure doctors are aware of recent developments, while real enforcement of disciplinary procedures will ensure that doctors who have committed serious offenses have their licenses revoked.  The best way to lessen the malpractice burden on everyone is to lessen the amount of malpractice committed.


In wrongful death cases, New York law awards fair and just compensation for the monetary injuries suffered as a result of the unnecessary and untimely death.  The law defines the factors that the jury may consider in calculating the value of the lost life.  The factors the jury may consider include the age, earning capacity, health, intelligence, and life expectancy of the decedent, as well as the degree of dependency of the distributees upon the decedent and the probable benefits they would have received but for the untimely death (McKee v. Colt Electronics Co., 849 F.2d 46).  Although what was lost can never be replaced, monetary damages can help victims' families cope with the loss caused by the negligence of others.

Profits Before Health by Martin M. Seinfeld

We live in a society where the health care system is for profit. That does not mean that there are not generous and kind individual doctors and health care providers who work for the good of their patients, but that the system itself has a goal, and that goal is profit, sometimes even over health. That does not just apply for the uninsured. When we pay for health insurance we enter into a contract with the company to pay for the covered medical bills. But if profit is the corporate goal, necessary coverage could be denied despite the patient's need or available coverage. Many of us have experienced this. I myself had coverage for my son denied again and again wrongfully, literally trying to wear me down just to pay the bill.

Welcome to our Queens New York Legal Blog

Personal injury and medical malpractice law change fast. Each day, state legislatures and judges make numerous decisions that impact the way cases are prepared and presented for court. At Pearlman, Apat, Futterman, Sirotkin & Seinfeld, LLP, we know that it's important to stay current with legal issues. That's why we follow the legal stories that will have an impact on the strategies we use while protecting your rights.

Privacy Policy | Law Firm Marketing by FindLaw, a Thomson Reuters business.