Free Consultations *

TOLL FREE: 866-679-2513
KEW GARDENS: 718-577-2573
WOODBURY: 516-681-0250
TO ALL OUR VALUED CLIENTS
We continue to be here for you as we monitor the current COVID-19 health crisis. Futterman, Sirotkin & Seinfeld remains open. Our staff is working remotely and the firm will continue to be functional and operational.

You can reach all of us via email or leave a message on our phone extensions and we will return the calls as quickly as possible.
We are concerned about the health and safety of all of our clients and wish all of you the best during these difficult times.

contact now
Over 60 Years In Queens County
Medical
Malpractice Arrow
Pesonal
Injury Arrow
Real
Estate Arrow
Estate /
Probate Arrow

Jury awards over $10.8 million to brain damaged man

| Aug 31, 2020 | Hospital Negligence

A jury in another state awarded a man who suffered brain damage close to $11 million in damages after finding a hospital and doctor liable for medical malpractice.

The man came to the hospital for an MRI, a scan of the inside of the man’s body. The man wanted the scan because he suffered from back pain.

Before the MRI, and as a routine procedure, the man ingested chemicals which included the element gadolinium. The man suffered an allergic reaction to the chemicals, and his heart stopped beating.

By the time doctors in the hospital resuscitated him, he had suffered severe and irreversible brain damage due to this drug error.

He now requires constant medical care and can no longer work. His parents, who filed this lawsuit on his behalf, said that they will be using the money to cover medical bills and provide for his future needs.

Preparation is key during a crisis

Even if the hospital and radiologist could not have predicted how the man responded to the drug, medical professionals have a duty to anticipate that sometimes, things will go surprisingly wrong.

They must be able to respond to a crisis in a timely fashion by being prepared and communicating with one other.

In this case, the testimony was that the examination room itself had neither an alarm nor medication that would have stopped the man’s allergic reaction. The nearest antidote was in the emergency room

While staff eventually sounded an alarm, the emergency room doctor did not know what the alarm meant. There were several other instances of miscommunication and delay which, the man’s family argued, cost valuable time.

The delay could well have been the difference between the man’s full recovery and his current medical condition.

As this case shows, failing to respond to an emergency situation professionally and decisively can cause a serious injury to a patient. No matter where such incidents take place, victims should have the right to recover compensation.

 

Archives

Need Answers? Contact Us for a Free Consultation

FindLaw Network