Free Consultations *

TOLL FREE: 866-679-2513
KEW GARDENS: 718-577-2573
WOODBURY: 516-681-0250
TO ALL OUR VALUED CLIENTS
We continue to be here for you as we monitor the current COVID-19 health crisis. Futterman, Sirotkin & Seinfeld remains open. Our staff is working remotely and the firm will continue to be functional and operational.

You can reach all of us via email or leave a message on our phone extensions and we will return the calls as quickly as possible.
We are concerned about the health and safety of all of our clients and wish all of you the best during these difficult times.

contact now
Over 60 Years In Queens County
Medical
Malpractice Arrow
Pesonal
Injury Arrow
Real
Estate Arrow
Estate /
Probate Arrow

Some medical malpractice verdicts may reflect personal motives

| May 6, 2014 | Surgical Errors

Many times, a malpractice victim’s health and entire way of life depends on the outcome of their lawsuit. Not only are medical malpractice suits crucial to upholding patient care standards in the medical community but they serve as an important legal resource for patients and their families. The integrity of the judicial process may be in question for some victims, however, now that there is evidence to suggest that some federal court judges may have a financial stake in the rulings they make.

A wide array of cases are tried through the federal appeals court circuit every year, and appellate court judges are responsible for making nationally significant rulings on everything from discrimination to medical malpractice disputes. And not surprisingly, appellate judges earn considerably more than most Americans as well. To ensure that financial conflicts do not arise in the courtroom, federal laws are in place mandating that federal judges recluse themselves from cases in which they have financial ties.

Federal guidelines addressing concerns over conflicts of interest for judges are so strict, in fact, that an automated database was created to monitor and flag incidents of financial conflict. Ultimately, the duty falls on judges to recluse themselves from any and all cases where they could stand to benefit financially from a particular ruling. But since there is no official punishment for judges that break the law by not separating themselves from cases appropriately, there are concerns over the prevalence of judges presiding over cases involving companies that they own stock in.

Reviewing the cases of 255 Appellate Court judges across the country, the Center for Public Integrity found that there were 24 incidents of judges illegally ruling on cases they had financial ties to.

Source: Huffington Post, “Federal Judges Admit Conflicts Of Interests, Leaving Litigants Reeling,” Reity O’Brien, Kytja Weir, Chris Young, April 28, 2014

Archives

Need Answers? Contact Us for a Free Consultation

FindLaw Network