Futterman, Sirotkin & Seinfeld, LLP
Free Consultations *
For Personal Injury and Medical Malpractice Matters Only
toll free: 866-679-2513
Kew Gardens: 718-577-2573
Woodbury: 516-681-0250
contact Menu
We continue to be here for you as we monitor the current COVID-19 health crisis. Futterman, Sirotkin & Seinfeld remains open. Our staff is working remotely and the firm will continue to be functional and operational.
You can reach all of us via email or leave a message on our phone extensions and we will return the calls as quickly as possible.
We are concerned about the health and safety of all of our clients and wish all of you the best during these difficult times.

Over 60 Years In Queens County

Thank you so much for all your help. You are a true God send and I feel blessed for having your assistance. Wishing you and your family well wishes and a Happy New Year too!

Thank you for “services rendered” to my complete satisfaction. On that note, a special thank you to Judy Ramirez and Veronica Fuentes for their many contributions. With your knowledge and experience...

Thank you for doing such a great job representing my son on the purchase of his condo. As I am sure you could tell, he was very nervous about the whole thing, been waiting for the other shoe to...

On behalf of the family of the Estate of Marlene U., I would like to express my sincere gratitude to the law firm of Futterman, Sirotkin & Seinfeld, LLP for its unwavering commitment...

I feel blessed that somehow your firm in and my life crossed because the result is the quality of my mother’s life in respect to current and future needs is secure …

Dear Martin and Ira, thank you so much for working so hard on my case for so many years. My life changed 10 years ago when this occurred. I'm glad this chapter of my life has closed.

Just wanted to express how happy I am with your firm. I have known you for over 15 years starting with the purchase of my first home and when I continued utilizing your services when...

Words can not fully express how grateful and impressed I am with your outstanding services. Working with you and your staff not only made me feel comfortable and reassured but ...

I wanted to express my sincere gratitude for your efforts over the last two years regarding my case. Your attention to the details surrounding-my case was second to none...

Me sentir bien comoda con mi dos abogados, el Sr. Martin y el Sr. Futterman, que me trataron mi caso con mucha delicadeza y puecieron mucho tiempo en mi case

Read More Testimonials
view our Practice areas

Some medical malpractice verdicts may reflect personal motives

Many times, a malpractice victim's health and entire way of life depends on the outcome of their lawsuit. Not only are medical malpractice suits crucial to upholding patient care standards in the medical community but they serve as an important legal resource for patients and their families. The integrity of the judicial process may be in question for some victims, however, now that there is evidence to suggest that some federal court judges may have a financial stake in the rulings they make.

A wide array of cases are tried through the federal appeals court circuit every year, and appellate court judges are responsible for making nationally significant rulings on everything from discrimination to medical malpractice disputes. And not surprisingly, appellate judges earn considerably more than most Americans as well. To ensure that financial conflicts do not arise in the courtroom, federal laws are in place mandating that federal judges recluse themselves from cases in which they have financial ties.

Federal guidelines addressing concerns over conflicts of interest for judges are so strict, in fact, that an automated database was created to monitor and flag incidents of financial conflict. Ultimately, the duty falls on judges to recluse themselves from any and all cases where they could stand to benefit financially from a particular ruling. But since there is no official punishment for judges that break the law by not separating themselves from cases appropriately, there are concerns over the prevalence of judges presiding over cases involving companies that they own stock in.

Reviewing the cases of 255 Appellate Court judges across the country, the Center for Public Integrity found that there were 24 incidents of judges illegally ruling on cases they had financial ties to.

Source: Huffington Post, “Federal Judges Admit Conflicts Of Interests, Leaving Litigants Reeling,” Reity O’Brien, Kytja Weir, Chris Young, April 28, 2014

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

Privacy Policy | Law Firm Marketing by FindLaw, part of Thomson Reuters.