Free Consultations *

TOLL FREE: 866-679-2513
KEW GARDENS: 718-577-2573
WOODBURY: 516-681-0250
TO ALL OUR VALUED CLIENTS
We continue to be here for you as we monitor the current COVID-19 health crisis. Futterman, Sirotkin & Seinfeld remains open. Our staff is working remotely and the firm will continue to be functional and operational.

You can reach all of us via email or leave a message on our phone extensions and we will return the calls as quickly as possible.
We are concerned about the health and safety of all of our clients and wish all of you the best during these difficult times.

contact now
Over 60 Years In Queens County
Medical
Malpractice Arrow
Pesonal
Injury Arrow
Real
Estate Arrow
Estate /
Probate Arrow

New York Bill Aims to Change How Medical Malpractice Claims Are Completed

A new bill continues to gain momentum in the New York State Assembly. The Personal Healthcare Information Privacy Act is designed to keep New York physicians accused of medical malpractice from privately interviewing other doctors who treated the victim but who are not parties to the malpractice suit – hopefully adding additional layers of privacy protections for victims of medical malpractice.

Details of Patient Privacy Protection Act

The New York bill overturns an earlier court case that permitted such interviews. The case at issue did include a caveat however: the interviews could only take place if in full compliance with the requirement of the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, known more commonly as HIPPA.

Under HIPPA, a patient’s medical records are carefully guarded for privacy. As a result, the HIPPA requirement meant defendants were required to receive permission from plaintiffs before they could conduct these interviews. This requirement meant additional paperwork for both sides of the case as well as the courts.

Impact on Medical Malpractice Claims

The defending physician often uses these interviews as a chance eliminate their liability by questioning if the plaintiff’s alleged injuries could be the result of a pre-existing condition, and not their own actions.

Defending physicians are obviously allowed to gather information about the treatments a patient received for a particular condition, but, since this information is available through medical files, the need for a defendant to have a private interview with treating physicians is unnecessary – which this new bill aims to codify in law.

The bill is intended to both streamline the court process by removing unnecessary requests for private interviews while upholding justice through providing the needed information in discovery by reviewing relevant files, not to mention it will continue to protect the privacy rights of medical malpractice victims.

If the bill is passed, the process of completing a medical malpractice case will be impacted. Navigating through this ever changing judicial system can be difficult. If you or a loved one is injured by the negligence of a medical practitioner, it is important to seek the counsel of an experienced medical malpractice attorney to ensure all your legal rights are protected.

Need Answers? Contact Us for a Free Consultation